Friday, 24 January 2014
Blue Monday Revised Current Events Post
Friday, 10 January 2014
Report card
Report card changes: Edited
I understand that Surrey Schools want to abandon letter grades because feedback would be much more effective. A,B's and C's are simply not enough to show the child's progress. About 34 schools in Surrey want to take on this new form of evaluation. They believe that this will have a better affect on the child's learning.
As for the parents, they will have a better understanding of the child's learning habits and can help them make goals for the future to improve. Sending samples to the parents of the child's work would show them how much the child has improved throughout the year.
It seems that parents would have a better understanding of their child's learning in which they can know what areas their child needs improvement on. By this the parents can then know the child's strengths and weaknesses.
As for the child, I believe that he or she will take things more seriously if they get letter grades. On the other hand it is also helpful for the child to get one on one feedback from his or her teacher. The child could then make sure to improve on that mistake.
In my opinion I think that high school students are old enough to get grades because then they know the expectations and how to exceed.I also believe that letter grades would motivate the student. For example if the got a B this term they would strive to get an A next term. If they got an A this term they would feel a lot of accomplishment and that would motivate them to keep doing their best. Whereas if it was just feedback they would not know how high the bar is set. But I know this idea will work very well on elementary students. They often don't understand why they got a certain letter grade and often come to the teacher for answers. So if teachers gave feedback to their students then they can discuss it with their parents and make goals for the future for what they want to improve on.
Here are a couple of links that have helped me write about this topic.
Http://bc.ctvnews.ca/mobile/dozen-more-surrey-schools-consider-scrapping-letter-grades-1.1630197
Here is another link that let me see both sides of the discussion
This link showed me that parents could really connect with their children's learning with this new program.
Thursday, 9 January 2014
Report cards
The idea of constructive feedback is that by offering more information about students projects and tasks, and focussing less on the superficial “A,B or C” evaluation. Antonio Vendramin, principle of George Vanier elementary school in surrey, says he appreciates that letter grades make it easy forparents to track their children’s progress – “It's an A, I know my kid is doing well”— but thinks they limit how students and parents interact over education.
So they are hoping that their removal steers people into the constructive feedback instead or A,B or C.
Report cards
Recently 34 elementary schools in surrey have made a shift to the new system. The new system lets parents and children how they are doing in class instead of bring a letter grade home; The new system is called constructive feedback also more elementary schools are slowly joining into the new system.The reason is because they want the parents to have a better understanding where there child is at.
The idea of constructive feedback is that by offering more information about students projects and tasks, and focussing less on the superficial “A,B or C” evaluation. Antonio Vendramin, principle of George Vanier elementary school in surrey, says he appreciates that letter grades make it easy forparents to track their children’s progress – “It's an A, I know my kid is doing well”— but thinks they limit how students and parents interact over education.
So they are hoping that their removal steers people into the constructive feedback instead or A,B or C.
Current Events 09/01/2014
Current Events
I read an article about a program in Surrey in which 39 schools are removing letter grades completely and replacing them with an explanation of what the student is doing good in and what the student is doing bad in. They believe that giving them in depth feedback is better than a plain old A or B. It may also be easier to change your work habits by seeing what you have done wrong, or right.
Some people think this may be a good idea. They think this because the student gets a better idea of what they are doing right or wrong. If they just get a B, that tells them nothing. It doesn't tell you if it was on time, what parts need improvement, etc. They cant see a B and instantly know what they are doing wrong. Telling them, "you could've handed it in a bit earlier, and made it a little bit more detailed" for example, is better, so they can fix what they have done wrong.
The other remaining people think this is bad. Getting to see an A or B is convenient. You instantly know that you're doing good, or bad. If you are doing bad, then it is probably obvious what you are doing wrong. They think an explanation isn't needed, because the student can figure it out on their own.
In my opinion, I don't see why they cant just keep both. If you see an A, then you know you're doing good, but then you can read and see which areas you're strong in. If you do bad, you can instantly see that you're doing bad and then you can see what you're doing wrong, and then change it. Having both is just a win-win situation, and doesn't get anyone mad.
In conclusion, I think it is a great idea, but I don't see why they can keep both.